2 comments

  • namaria 19 days ago
    I suspect a lot of these cases might be people believing that "others" have super vivid, holographic 3D color models of things floating in front of their eyes when they "imagine" things.
    • kordlessagain 14 days ago
      I have a close friend who does have what you describe here, being able to create a manipulatable model of underground formations from a seismic map, floating above his desk, AR like.

      As this stuff is almost impossible to prove or disprove, what we are left with is either trusting someone when they self report OR assuming everyone uses our own way of thinking (from a self standpoint).

      I think the later is quite egotistical in nature, and obviously incorrect when applied to physical attributes, so I'd rather go with the former personally.

    • noname120 17 days ago
      What makes you think so?
      • namaria 16 days ago
        It's just a nagging feeling that "aphantasia" is based more on semantics or misunderstanding than a neurological reality.
  • fzzzy 20 days ago
    I have aphantasia (self-reported, I guess, is there an objective marker? Brain scan?) and I have extremely vivid audio imagery.
    • kordlessagain 20 days ago
      Interesting. The correlation is not 100% according to the study, but it does seem to be related, somehow. Strangely, I've read for a while ~40% of the population has audio recall/echoic recall, which doesn't seem to match up with this latest study. I think it's maybe hard to study this stuff because of the nature of what is being discussed. Many times I've asked someone who seems to be an aphant, that they report they can "see" something in mind, simply because they think that's how it's referred to with words. In reality, aphants simply don't see anything at all, but know what it looks like. So then later an aphant will admit they don't actually create and see the image in mind. At least, that's how I put it. And I don't do audio recall either.
    • mharig 20 days ago
      [dead]